Psychometric Parameter of the Quality of School Life Scale

  • Istiqomah Istiqomah Universitas Negeri Malang & Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
  • Bambang Budi Wiyono Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Hetti Rahmawati Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Tutut Chusniyah Universitas Negeri Malang
Keywords: Psychometric, Parameter, Quality, School

Abstract

Quality of school life reflects the students’ perception of their satisfaction and well-being based on their positive and negative experiences and their activities at school. This research aims to adapt the quality of school life scale in Indonesia and examine their validity and reliability. The subjects of this study were high school students (N=203). Data collection using Google Form. The research instrument is an adapted Quality of School Life scale. The obtained data was analyzed with CFA. The RMSEA Model Fit = 0,048, CFI= 0,930, TLI = 0,923, and SRMR = 0,077. The analysis revealed that from 29 items, two items had a factor loading < 0,40; for other items, the factor loading was between 0,508-0,890. Only 27 items are considered valid. The scale's reliability was CR = 0,98; Alpha 0, 921. The content validity is measured with Aiken V, and a coefficient of 0.79 was revealed. The AVE value > 0.50 in all aspects indicated that the scale has high convergent validity. The square root of AVE is higher in terms of the correlation between aspects, and only one aspect has a lower score, which suggests that this scale has high discriminant validity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Azwar S. 2017. Metode Penelitian Psikologi. Pustaka Pelajar. ISBN. 978-602-229732-1

Azwar S. 2022. Penyusunan Skala Psikologi.Pustaka Pelajar. ISBN. 978-623-236-143-0

Alwi, M., Wiyono, B. B., Bafadal, I., & Imron, A. (2021). The Relationship between Personality, Attitude, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior of Senior High School Teachers in Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 345–368. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14220a

Bayram, G., & Eksioglu, S. (2020). The relationship between the quality of school life and the school burnout. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(3), 531–538. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i3.20686

BÖKEOĞLU, Ö. Ç. (2007). Analysis of University Students’ Views about the Quality of Faculty Life Using Various Variables. Ankara Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Fakultesi Dergisi, 001–026. https://doi.org/10.1501/egifak_0000000171

Crocker, L., Crocker, L., Alglna, J., Staudt, M., Mercurio, S., Hintz, K., & Walker, R. A. (2008). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory.

Denise F. Polit, Cheryl Tatano Beck, S. V. O. (2007). Focus on Research Methods Is the CVI an Acceptable Indicator of Content Validity? Appraisal and Recommendations. 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur

Ford, J. K., Mac Callum, R. C., & Tait, M. (1986). the Application of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Applied Psychology: a Critical Review and Analysis. Personnel Psychology, 39(2), 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1986.tb00583.x

Ghotra, S., McIsaac, J. L. D., Kirk, S. F. L., & Kuhle, S. (2016). Validation of the “Quality of Life in School” instrument in Canadian elementary school students. PeerJ, 2016(1). https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1567

Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BC, A. R. (2017). Multivariate Data Analysis (MVDA). In Pharmaceutical Quality by Design: A Practical Approach. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118895238.ch8

Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P. F., & Spielberger, C. D. (2004). Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. Adapting Educational and Psychological Tests for Cross-Cultural Assessment, 1–378. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410611758

Hernández, A., Hidalgo, M. D., Hambleton, R. K., & Gómez-Benito, J. (2020). International test commission guidelines for test adaptation: A criterion checklist. Psicothema, 32(3), 390–398. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2019.306

Hidajat, H. G., Hanurawan, F., Chusniyah, T., Rahmawati, H., & Gani, S. A. (2023). The Role of Self-Efficacy in Improving Student Academic Motivation. KnE Social Sciences, 2023, 175–187. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i19.14362

Hintze, D., & Beyerlein, S. (2016). Major Topics in Process Education : A Directory of Scholarship and Tools. 8(2), 3–24.

Huang, C. H., Wang, T. F., Tang, F. I., Chen, I. J., & Yu, S. (2017). Development and validation of a Quality of Life Scale for elementary school students. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 17(2), 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2017.01.001

Iliescu, D. (2017). Adapting Test in Linguistic and Cultural Situation. In Cambridge University (First edit). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316273203

Konu, A., & Rimpelä, M. (2002). Well-being in schools: A conceptual model. Health Promotion International, 17(1), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/17.1.79

Linnakylä, P. (1996). Quality of school life in the finnish comprehensive school: A comparative view. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 40(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/0031383960400105

Meltem, A. K., & Ilker, K. (2015). Effects of high school students perceptions of school life quality on their academic motivation levels. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(3), 274–281. https://doi.org/10.5897/err2014.1927

Newhouse, D. L., & Beegle, K. (2011). The Effect of School Type on Academic Achievement: Evidence from Indonesia. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.753544

Prasstianingrum, N. E., & Rusmawati, D. (2010). Hubungan antara. 4, 1–27.

Romlah, O. Y., & Latief, S. (2021). Empowering the Quality of School Resources in Improving the Quality of Education. Bulletin of Science Education, 1(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.51278/bse.v1i1.109

Samsudin, Wiyono, B. B., Putra, A. P., & Musa, K. (n.d.). The Effect of Subject- Teacher Meeting Activities on The Teacher ’ s Teaching Quality and Student ’ s Learning Outcomes. 8984, 737–754.

Sari, M. (2012). Assesment of School Lİ Fe : Reliability and Validity of Quality. 1998, 344–355.

Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2016). A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. In A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315749105

Sulistyosari, Y., Wardana, A., Irene, S., & Dwiningrum, A. (2023). School zoning and equal education access in Indonesia. 12(2), 586–593. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i2.22488

Sumarsono, R. B., Imron, A., Wiyono, B. B., & Arifin, I. (2016). Parents’ Participation in Improving the Quality of Elementary School in the City of Malang, East Java, Indonesia. International Education Studies, 9(10), 256. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n10p256

Suryanto, & Komary. (2019). The implementation of school zonation system in Yogyakarta. January. https://doi.org/10.2991/icosihess-19.2019.87

Thien, L. M., & Razak, N. A. (2013). Academic Coping, Friendship Quality, and Student Engagement Associated with Student Quality of School Life: A Partial Least Square Analysis. Social Indicators Research, 112(3), 679–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0077-x

Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2020). Structural Equation Modeling Applications Using Mplus. In Wiley.

Weintraub, N., & Erez, A. B. H. (2009). Quality of Life in School (QoLS) questionnaire: Development and validity. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63(6), 724–731. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.63.6.724

Williams, T. & Batten, M. (1981) The Quality of School Life, ACER Research monograph No. 12 (Hawthorn, Vic., ACER). Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research

Wiyono, B. B., Burhanuddin, & Maisyaroh. (2020). Comparative effect of the supervision of the principal and quality of organizational management in school education. Utopia y Praxis Latinoamericana, 25(Extra10), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4155681

Published
2024-06-16
How to Cite
Istiqomah, I., Wiyono, B. B., Rahmawati, H., & Chusniyah, T. (2024). Psychometric Parameter of the Quality of School Life Scale. Journal An-Nafs: Kajian Penelitian Psikologi, 9(1), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.33367/psi.v9i1.4617