Analysis of Student Errors in Solving SPLDV Problems based on Newman's theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33367/jtme.v1i2.4117Keywords:
Student Errors, Newman Theory, SPLDVAbstract
The purpose of this study was to describe the types of errors made by Class VIII students when solving SPLDV questions based on Newman's theory. This qualitative research aims to provide descriptive information about individuals or observed behavior in the form of written or spoken words. Written tests and interviews were used to collect data. The test was carried out on all 25 Class VIII students, and then 3 of the 25 students were selected as research subjects. Data were analyzed by reducing information, presenting information, and drawing conclusions. The results of the work of individual testers were analyzed for the types of errors using the Newman analysis method. The factors that led to student errors were then explained in the interviews. Based on the study results, it can be concluded that the errors made by students in the SPLDV questions are as follows: 1) Failure to understand the problem, including not recording what is known and what is not in the duration of the task. Ask when in trouble. 2) Conversion errors, including misunderstanding of the billing method used. 3) Commanding process failure involves failing to continue to complete the process. 4) Error in writing HP, including not writing down HP. Student errors occur when students are not careful when solving problems, are too busy, or do not practice narrative tasks. 3) Commanding process failure involves failing to continue to complete the process. 4) Error in writing HP, including not writing down HP. Student errors occur when students are not careful when solving problems, are too busy, or do not practice narrative tasks. 3) Commanding process failure involves failing to continue to complete the process. 4) Error in writing HP, including not writing down HP. Student errors occur when students are not careful when solving problems, are too busy, or do not practice narrative tasks
References
Azmia, Seila, dan Slamet Soro. (2021). “Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel Ditinjau dari Taksonomi Solo pada Siswa.†Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika.
Chairunnisa, Dwi Suci, dan Karunia Eka Lestari. (2022). “Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Pada Siswa Kelas VIII di MTS Terpadu Attaqwa 04.†Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai.
Hanipa, Akbar, dan Veny Triyana Andika Sari. (2019). “Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel Pada Siswa Kelas VIII Mts Di Kabupaten Bandung Barat.†Journal on Education 1 (2): 15–22. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v1i2.18.
Hariyani, Sri, dan Verena Cony Aldita. (2020). “Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel Berdasarkan Prosedur Newman.†Al-Khwarizmi: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Maret.
Hariyani, Sri, Yustinus Partinggi, dan Timbul Yuwono. (2022). “Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dengan Gaya Belajar Visual Dala Menyelesaikan SPLDV Berdasarkan Tahapan Newman.†Triple S (Journals of Mathematics Education) 2 (2): 68–86.
Kosasih, Fajar, dan Heni Pujiastuti. (2020). “Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Dalam Mengerjakan Soal Cerita Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel.†Jurnal Maju.
Mamonto, Chofifa Indah E., Rosiah J. Pulukadang, dan Ontang Manurung. (2022). “Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Spldv Berdasarkan Teori Newman Di Kelas VIII.†ADIBA : JOURNAL OF EDUCATION 2 (4): 571–80.
Prabawati, Mega Nur, Siska Ryane Muslim, dan Muhamad Zulfikar Mansyur. (2021). “Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama di Kota Tasikmalaya dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Literasi Matematis pada Materi SPLDV.†JP3M (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Matematika) 7 (2): 117–28. https://doi.org/10.37058/jp3m.v7i2.3661.
Susilowati, Puji Lestari, dan Novisita Ratu. (2018). “Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Berdasarkan Tahapan Newman dan Scaffolding Pada Materi Aritmatika Sosial.†Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 7 (1): 13–24. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v7i1.337.
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Abstract
Views:
92,
PDF downloads: 117


















