Profile of Mathematical Reasoning Ability of Students of SMK Ma'wataibin Pagelaran in Solving Problems of Arithmetic Rows and Rows

Authors

  • Ucik Fitri Handayani Universitas Al-Qolam Malang
  • Risma Cahya Setiawati Universitas Al-Qolam Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33367/jtme.v2i1.5151

Keywords:

Reasoning Ability, Mathematics, Arithmetic Rows

Abstract

This study describes the profile of students' mathematical reasoning ability in solving arithmetic rows and series problems. Based on the results of observations and interviews with the mathematics teacher of class X SMK Ma'wataibin Pagelaran Malang, information was obtained that 83% of students in the class tended not to be able to conclude the answer. This descriptive research uses a qualitative approach. The sample of this research is 19 students of class X SMK Ma'wataibin Pagelaran. They then selected one each in the high, medium, and low-level categories. Then, interviews were conducted with each subject to explore deeper information. The test instrument used is 1 question that contains four indicators of mathematical reasoning ability. The test results obtained that students in the high mathematical reasoning ability category amounted to 7 students, with a percentage of 36.85%. Students in the moderate mathematical reasoning ability category amounted to 8 students, with a rate of 42.10%. Students in the low mathematical reasoning ability category amounted to 4 students, with a rate of 21.05%. Based on the results of the data analysis, it is shown that high-category students fulfill four indicators of reasoning ability according to their abilities. Medium-category students correctly fulfill three indicators of mathematical reasoning ability: writing conjectures, doing work, and providing reasons/evidence. Low-category students only fulfill one indicator of mathematical reasoning ability, namely writing conjectures.

References

Andrianti, D. S., & Rahayu, P. (2022). Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Berdasarkan Kecerdasan Logis Matematis Melalui Soal Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum. JTMT: Journal Tadris Matematika, 3(2), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.47435/jtmt.v3i2.1189

Anggraini, Y. (2021). Analisis Persiapan Guru dalam Pembelajaran Matematika di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(4), 2415–2422.

Ate, D., & Lede, Y. K. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Siswa Kelas VIII dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Literasi Numerasi. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 472–483. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i1.1041

Chisara, C., Hakim, D. L., & Kartika, H. (2018). Implementasi Pendekatan Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika (Sesiomadika), 65–72. Retrieved from http://journal.unsika.ac.id/index.php/sesiomadika

Diva, S. A., Khafidin, D., & Ulya, H. (2022). Pengaplikasian Pmri Dengan Soal Hots Guna Meningkatkan Kompetensi Literasi Numerasi Dalam Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, 9, 138–148. Retrieved from https://conference.umk.ac.id/index.php/snapmat/article/view/191

Ekstam, U., Korhonen, J., Linnanmäki, K., & Aunio, P. (2018). Special education and subject teachers’ self-perceived readiness to teach mathematics to low-performing middle school students. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 18(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12393

Fitri, S. F. N. (2021). Problematika Kualitas Pendidikan di Indonesia Siti. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Teknologi Indonesia, 1(4), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.52436/1.jpti.26

Handayani, U. F. (2020). Analisis Hambatan Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Pada Pelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Pusaka, 9(2), 22–36. Retrieved from http://ejournal.alqolam.ac.id/index.php/jurnal_pusaka/article/view/465/372

Kaka, A. E. L., Ate, D., & Making, S. R. M. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Siswa SMP N.1 Kota Tambolaka. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika Sumba, 3(2), 88–96. Retrieved from https://jurnalstkip-weetebula.ac.id/index.php/jppms/article/view/282

Kemendikbud. (2016). Permendikbud No 21 Tahun 2016.

Munasiah, M., Solihah, A., & Heriyati, H. (2020). Pemahaman Konsep dan Penalaran Matematika Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Matriks. SAP (Susunan Artikel Pendidikan), 5(1), 73–78. https://doi.org/10.30998/sap.v5i1.6231

OECD. (2019). Snapshot of performance in reading, mathematics and science. https://doi.org/10.1787/cbb85a0d-en

Oktaviana, V., Noor Aini, I., Singaperbangsa Karawang, U., Ronggo Waluyo, J. H., Teluk Jambe Timur, K., & Barat, J. (2021). DESKRIPSI KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS SISWA SMP KELAS VIII. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v4i3.587-600

Puka, A. O. B., Weking, M. K., & Betan, P. R. (2021). ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP MATEMATIKA PADA KELAS XI BUDAYA DI SMAK St. FRANSISKUS ASISI LARANTUKA. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika Sumba, 3(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.53395/jppms.v3i1.238

Ruslan, A. ., & Santoso, B. (2013). Pengaruh Pemberian Soal Open-Ended Terhadap Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa. Jurnal Kreano, 4(2), 138–150.

Saputra, Y. P., Baidowi, Wulandari, N. P., & Hikmah, N. (2023). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa pada Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel. JCAR (Journal of Classroom Action Research), 5(1), 85–74. https://doi.org/10.29303/jcar.v5i1.2800

Sulistiawati, S., Suryadi, D., & Fatimah, S. (2015). Desain Didaktis Penalaran Matematis untuk Mengatasi Kesulitan Belajar Siswa SMP pada Luas dan Volume Limas. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 6(2), 135. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v6i2.4833

Yolanda, F., & Wahyuni, P. (2020). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berbantuan Macromedia Flash. SJME (Supremum Journal of Mathematics Education), 4(2), 170–177. https://doi.org/10.35706/sjme.v4i2.3612

Downloads

Abstract Views: 119, PDF downloads: 76

Published

2024-03-31

How to Cite

Fitri Handayani, U., & Cahya Setiawati, R. (2024). Profile of Mathematical Reasoning Ability of Students of SMK Ma’wataibin Pagelaran in Solving Problems of Arithmetic Rows and Rows. Noumerico: Journal of Technology in Mathematics Education, 2(1), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.33367/jtme.v2i1.5151