Epistemology of the Integration of Religion and Science Qur'anic Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33367/tribakti.v33i2.2833Keywords:
integration, religion, science, epistemologyAbstract
The problem facing contemporary epistemology is the dichotomy between revelation, reason, and the senses. The West prioritizes reason and senses, ignoring revelation, causing civilization to deviate from its nature. Eastern Islam puts forward revelation that ignores reason and senses so that it cannot solve contemporary problems because its knowledge is not built on natural and social laws. This paper is intended to answer this epistemological problem by using a philosophical method with a library research approach. From this discussion, it was found that there are three tools for producing knowledge according to the perspective of the Qur'an, namely, revelation, reason, and the senses. Revelation is a tool to know the unseen while reason and senses are tools to produce natural and social domains. All of these tools are combined and integrated into obtaining the expected knowledge.
References
Ardiyanti, Aprilia Dewi. “Perspektif al-qur’an tentang sel saraf dalam kajian integrasi agama dan sains.†Prosiding Konferensi Integrasi Interkoneksi Islam dan Sains 2 (2020): 61–63.
Armstrong, Karen. Masa Depan Tuhan: Sanggahan Terhadap Fundementalisme Dan Atheisme. Mizan Pustaka, 2014.
Aziz, Muhammad Thariq. “Asal Usul Bahasa Dalam Perspektif al-Qur’an Dan Sains Modern.†utile: Jurnal Kependidikan 2, no. 2 (2016): 125–49.
Barbour, Ian G., Armahedi Mahzar, dan Fransiskus Borgias. Menemukan Tuhan dalam Sains Kontemporer dan Agama. Mizan Pustaka, 2005.
Conyers, Marcus, dan Donna Wilson. “Smart moves: Powering up the brain with physical activity.†Phi Delta Kappan 96, no. 8 (2015): 38–42.
Darmaji, Agus. “Herbert marcuse tentang masyarakat satu dimensi.†Ilmu Ushuluddin 1, no. 6 (2013): 515–26.
Daud, Ilyas. “Islam dan Sains Modern (Telaah Pemikiran Nidhal Quessoum Dalam Karyanya Islam’s Quantum Question, Reconciling Muslim Tradition And Modern Science).†Jurnal Al-Mutaaliyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah 4, no. 1 (2019): 74–89.
dkk, Dr Muhammad Farid, M. Sos. Fenomenologi: Dalam Penelitian Ilmu Sosial. Prenada Media, 2018.
Efrinaldi, Efrinaldi, Toha Andiko, dan Taufiqurrahman Taufiqurrahman. “The Paradigm of Science Integration in Islamic University: The Historicity and Development Pattern of Islamic Studies in Indonesia.†Madania: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman 24, no. 1 (10 Juli 2020): 97–108. https://doi.org/10.29300/madania.v24i1.3326.
Fakhry, Jamal. “Sains dan Teknologi dalam al-Qur’an dan Implikasinya dalam Pembelajaran.†Ta’dib: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 15, no. 01 (2010): 121–42.
Goble, Frank G. The Third Force: The Psychology of Abraham Maslow. New York: Grossman, 1970.
Haas, John D., dan Richard Van Scotter. “An inquiry model for the social studies.†NASSP Bulletin 59, no. 389 (1975): 74–81.
Harry, Schofield. “The Philosophy of Education. An Introduction.†London: Routledge, 2012.
Holilulloh, Andi, dan Fouad Larhzizer. “The Islamization Of Knowledge.†Jurnal Ilmiah Citra Ilmu 16, no. 32 (2020): 53–62.
Huda, A. “Usaha Pengembangan Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman (Perspektif Filsafat Ilmu tentang Studi Integrasi Islam dan Sains).†Misbahul Ulum (Jurnal Institusi), no. Query date: 2022-08-02 10:26:35 (2019). http://jurnal.stitmugu.ac.id/index.php/misbahul/article/view/2.
Isgandi, Yiyin. “Model Integrasi Nilai Islam Dan Sains Beserta Implementasinya Di Dunia Islam.†Kalimah: Jurnal Studi Agama Dan Pemikiran Islam 19, no. 1 (2021): 27–48.
Khan, Kamran. The Philosophy of Education : An Introduction. Routledge, 2012. http://www.myilibrary.com?id=389791.
Kurnianto, Rido. “Perbandingan Konsepsi Epistemologi Empirisisme Ibnu Taymiyyah dan John Locke.†TSAQAFAH 10, no. 1 (2014): 153–66.
Mahzar, Armahedi. “Integrasi sains dan agama: model dan metodologi.†dalam Jarot Wahyudi, Integrasi Ilmu dan Agama: Interpretasi dan Aksi,(Yogyakarta: MYIA-CRCS dan Suka Press, 2005), 2005.
Markley, Robert. “As If: The Alternative Histories of Literature and Science.†Configurations 26, no. 3 (2018): 259–68.
———. Dying planet: Mars in science and the imagination. Duke University Press, 2005.
Masruri, HM Hadi. “Filsafat Sains Dalam Al-Qur’an: Melacak Kerangka Dasar Integrasi Ilmu Dan Agama.†El-Qudwah, 2007.
Mukit, Abdul, dan Zainal Abidin. “Solusi Problematika Dikotomi Ilmu di Perguruan Tinggi Agama Islam: Analisis terhadap Kebijakan Pendidikan Tinggi.†Al-Irfan: Journal of Arabic Literature and Islamic Studies 4, no. 2 (2021): 186–202.
Muslih, Mohammad. “Pengaruh Budaya dan Agama Terhadap Sains; Sebuah Survey Kritis†6 (30 November 2010): 225. https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v6i2.119.
Nur, Afrizal, dan Imansyah Putra. “Relasi Estetika dengan Kebenaran: Kajian Integrasi Teori Simetri Sains Fisika dan Al-Qur’an.†Nun : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Tafsir di Nusantara 4, no. 1 (4 Mei 2019): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.32495/nun.v4i1.34.
Nurcholis, M. “Integrasi Islam Dan Sains: Sebuah Telaah Epistemologi.†FALASIFA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, no. Query date: 2022-08-02 10:26:35 (2021). http://ejournal.inaifas.ac.id/index.php/falasifa/article/view/461.
Purwaningrum, Septiana. “Elaborasi ayat-ayat sains dalam Al-Quran: Langkah menuju integrasi agama dan sains dalam pendidikan.†Inovatif: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, Agama, Dan Kebudayaan 1, no. 1 (2015): 124–41.
Putri, Rasyiani, Adelio Ramadhan, dan Muhammad Afif. “Perspektif Islam Terhadap Integrasi Perkembangan Ilmu Teknologi.†ADI Bisnis Digital Interdisiplin Jurnal 2, no. 1 Juni (21 Juni 2021): 48–54. https://doi.org/10.34306/abdi.v2i1.447.
Rofiq, Nur, dan M. Zidny Nafi Hasbi. “Mendamaikan Tradisi Muslim dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Modern: Kajian Eksploratif Pemikiran Nidhal Guessoum.†Al-Irfan: Journal of Arabic Literature and Islamic Studies 4, no. 2 (2021): 203–16.
Roszak, Theodore. “Gnosis and reductionism.†Science 187, no. 4179 (1975): 790–92.
———. The Voice of the Earth: An Exploration of Ecopsychology. Red Wheel/Weiser, 2001.
Salk, Jonas E. “Biology in the future.†Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 5, no. 4 (1962): 423–31.
Scotter, Richard D. Van, Richard J. Kraft, dan John D. Haas. Foundations of Education: Social Perspectives. Prentice-Hall, 1979.
Shihab, M. Quraish. Wawasan Al-Quran: Tafsir tematik atas pelbagai persoalan umat. Mizan Pustaka, 1996.
Sholahudin, Umar. “Membedah Teori Kritis Mazhab Frankfurt: Sejarah, Asumsi, dan Kontribusinya Terhadap Perkembangan Teori Ilmu Sosial.†Journal of Urban Sociology 3, no. 2 (2020): 71–89.
Sopu, Salahuddin. “Misykât Al-Anwâr Karya Al-Ghazali: Sekelumit Catatan Kontroversi Dan Teologi Pencerahan Sufistiknya.†MADANIA 20, no. 2 (2016): 10.
Sultanova, Mira. “Theodore Roszak and Counterculture: Rethinking the World’s Challenges.†Dalam Proceedings of the XXII World Congress of Philosophy, 46:99–108, 2008.
Thamrin, Rosiyati MH, dan Eka Purnama Harahap. “Mengintegrasikan Pandangan Al-Qur’an dengan Perspektif Sains dan Teknologi.†ADI Bisnis Digital Interdisiplin Jurnal 2, no. 1 Juni (2021): 86–88.
Van Scotter, Richard D. “A Prescription for Teaching Social Studies in the Seventies.†The Social Studies 63, no. 4 (1972): 170–76.
Wahid, Abdul. “Dikotomi Ilmu Pengetahuan.†Istiqra: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pemikiran Islam 1, no. 2 (2014).
Worden, Jennifer M., Christina Hinton, dan Kurt W. Fischer. “What does the brain have to do with learning?†Phi Delta Kappan 92, no. 8 (2011): 8–13.
Abstract
Views:
769, 
PDF downloads: 408
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
