In Sons and Lovers, The Reader's Response was Analyzed in Feminist Perspective

Authors

  • Fouad Abbas University of Wasit, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Department of theoretical Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33367/ijhass.v4i3.4260

Keywords:

Reader Response, D.H. Lawrence, Sons and Lovers, Literary Analysis, Feminist Interpretation

Abstract

This article investigates reader responses to the classic literary work "Sons and Lovers" by D.H. Lawrence using a feminist perspective. Through a literary analysis approach, this research explores how readers respond to feminist aspects in the novel, particularly in the context of resisting patriarchal views. The article provides background information on D.H. Lawrence's life and how his personal experiences are reflected in this work, with an emphasis on feminist elements within the narrative. The research methodology involves in-depth textual analysis and a survey of reader responses to understand how women in the story challenge patriarchal norms and how readers, especially from a feminist perspective, perceive and interpret the involvement of female characters. In the context of feminist theory, this research discusses how "Sons and Lovers" presents a portrayal of power dynamics and gender inequality, as well as how female characters in the novel attempt to resist or adapt to existing social norms. The research findings are expected to provide insights into the impact of feminist theory on readers' understanding and responses to literary works, particularly in the context of "Sons and Lovers. In conclusion, this research delved into the exploration of D.H. Lawrence's "Sons and Lovers" through the lens of reader-response theory, revealing the pivotal role of the reader's experience, knowledge, and cultural background in shaping their perception of the literary work. The initial section provided a contextual backdrop by elucidating Lawrence's personal and societal milieu, emphasizing the autobiographical aspects intertwined with the broader human experience.

References

Atasoy, Emrah. “From the Text to the Reader: An Application of Reader-Response Theory to Robert Browning’s ‘My Last Duchess.’†Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi, no. 7 (December 15, 2020): 196–209. https://doi.org/10.46250/kulturder.828951.

Babaee, Ruzbeh, and Iraj Montashery. “Stanley Fish with Respect to the Reader.†International Journal of English and Literature. Vol 3, no. 2 (2012): 18–24.

Beach, Richard. “Critical Discourse Theory and Reader Response: How Discourses Constitute Reader Stances and Social Contexts.†Reader 37 (1997): 1.

———. “Critical Issues: Reading and Responding to Literature at the Level of Activity.†Journal of Literacy Research 32, no. 2 (June 1, 2000): 237–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862960009548075.

Brooks, Wanda, and Susan Browne. “Towards a Culturally Situated Reader Response Theory.†Children’s Literature in Education 43, no. 1 (March 2012): 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-011-9154-z.

Caserio, Robert L. “Beyond Oedipal Psychology in ‘Sons and Lovers’: Lawrence’s ‘Foreword’ to Being and History.†The D.H. Lawrence Review 39, no. 2 (2014): 97–115.

Doherty, Gerald. “D. H. Lawrence’s ‘Sons and Lovers’ and the Culture of Sacrifice.†The D.H. Lawrence Review 34/35 (2010): 5–24.

Fish, Stanley. “Literature in the Reader: Affective Stylistics.†New Literary History 2, no. 1 (1970): 123–62. https://doi.org/10.2307/468593.

Gale, Cengage Learning. A Study Guide for DH Lawrence’s" Sons and Lovers". Gale Cengage Learning, 2016. https://books.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=G6GpDAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT32&dq=%22Sons+and+lovers+analysis+artwork&ots=DBHka-5vzk&sig=D9_pj2SRn4U4QAWyw2UZWEiOuIs.

Han, Seolji. “The Ethics of Melancholic Subjectivity in Sons and Lovers.†The D.H. Lawrence Review 41, no. 2 (2016): 7–25.

Harkin, Patricia. “The Reception of Reader-Response Theory.†College Composition and Communication, 2005, 410–25.

Harrison, Andrew. “‘I Tell You It Has Got Form — Form’: Plot, Structure, and Meaning in ‘Sons and Lovers.’†The D.H. Lawrence Review 39, no. 2 (2014): 11–24.

Harvey, Geoffrey. “Feminist Criticism.†In Sons and Lovers, edited by Geoffrey Harvey, 32–38. The Critics Debate. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18507-8_5.

Holland, Norman N. “Reader-Response Criticism.†The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 79, no. 6 (1998): 1203.

Lawrence, David Herbert. Sons and Lovers: DH Lawrence. United Kingdom: Gerald Duckworth and Company, 1913.

Mart, Cagri. “Reader-Response Theory and Literature Discussions: A Springboard for Exploring Literary Texts.†The New Educational Review 56, no. 2 (2019): 78–87.

Muhiddin, La. “Characterization in The Novel Entitled Sons and Lovers By DH Lawrence.†LINGUA : Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya 12, no. 2 (September 1, 2015): 187–200. https://doi.org/10.30957/lingua.v12i2.27.

Ogene, S. M. “Psycho-Analysis in Fiction and a Study of D. H. Lawrence’s Sons and Lovers.†AFRREV LALIGENS: An International Journal of Language, Literature and Gender Studies 2, no. 1 (2013): 95–116. https://doi.org/10.4314/laligens.v2i1.

Persson Brunsell, Oskar. A Mother's Failure : An Analysis of Mrs. Morel in D.H. Lawrence's Sons and Lovers, 2020. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-31474.

Reid, Susan. “Lawrence’s Case of Wagner: The White Peacock and The Trespasser.†In D.H. Lawrence, Music and Modernism, edited by Susan Reid, 53–83. Palgrave Studies in Music and Literature. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04999-7_3.

Rosenhan, Claudia. “Euthanasia in ‘Sons and Lovers’ and D. H. Lawrence’s Metaphysic of Life.†The D.H. Lawrence Review 32/33 (2003): 1–18.

Selden, Raman, Peter Widdowson, and Peter Brooker. A Reader’s Guide to Contemporary Literary Theory. Routledge, 2013. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315835358/reader-guide-contemporary-literary-theory-peter-brooker-peter-widdowson-raman-selden.

Spirovska, Elena. “Reader-Response Theory and Approach: Application, Values and Significance for Students in Literature Courses.†SEEU Review 14, no. 1 (July 1, 2019): 20–35. https://doi.org/10.2478/seeur-2019-0003.

Tyson, Cynthia A. “‘Get Up Offa That Thing’: African American Middle School Students Respond to Literature to Develop a Framework for Understanding Social Action.†Theory & Research in Social Education 30, no. 1 (January 1, 2002): 42–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2002.10473178.

Tyson, Lois. Using Critical Theory: How to Read and Write About Literature. Routledge, 2020.

Downloads

Abstract Views: 145, PDF downloads: 186

Published

2023-11-30

How to Cite

Fouad Abbas. (2023). In Sons and Lovers, The Reader’s Response was Analyzed in Feminist Perspective. Indonesian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(3), 567-582. https://doi.org/10.33367/ijhass.v4i3.4260