The Process of Implementing The Integrated Dynamic Archiving System (Srikandi) Program in The East Belitung Regency Government
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33367/ijhass.v5i2.5776Keywords:
Program Implementation, , Integrated Dynamic Archival Information SystemAbstract
This research is motivated by the Electronic-Based Government System (SPBE) policy in Presidential Decree 95 of 2018. Among the applications mandated, the Indonesian Ministry of PAN RB established the General Application for Dynamic Archiving (AUBKD), named the Integrated Dynamic Archiving Implementation System (SRIKANDI), through the Decree of the Minister of PAN RB number 679 of 2020. SRIKANDI is mandated for implementation in government agencies, regional governments, BUMN/D, and universities across Indonesia. SRIKANDI, derived from Presidential Decree 95 of 2018, has elicited varied responses from these entities, especially those with existing archiving applications and significant investments. Some agencies have not adopted SRIKANDI due to their established systems, while others, like East Belitung Regency, lacking an archiving application, chose SRIKANDI. This study employs a qualitative approach with descriptive analysis to explore the implementation process of the SRIKANDI program in East Belitung. The goal is to describe the implementation using the Van Meter and Van Horn models. Findings indicate that implementation and communication activities between organizations, internally within East Belitung Regency and externally with the government, were conducted directly. However, the results were suboptimal, highlighting the need for improved communication planning for effectiveness. The East Belitung Regency government, including the designated implementation team, did not fully grasp the broader context of the SRIKANDI program, focusing instead on distributing the application to regional ASN. This misalignment with the program's context, intent, and objectives, along with insufficient supervision, led to less-than-optimal results. Economic, social, and political conditions impacting the SRIKANDI program had a positive but insufficiently budgeted influence. The program's disposition shows that the implementation stages are clear, as evidenced by the SRIKANDI action plan document. Implementing resources have been enhanced, particularly in using the SRIKANDI application, through training by ANRI and the East Belitung Regency team.
References
Agfi, R. N., Nur, T., & Purwanti, D. (2024). Implementation Of The Hope Family Program (PKH) In Cibeureum District Sukabumi City. DIA: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 22(01), 312-321.
Ajibola, O., Segun, B., Olubunmi, O., & Ibrahim, O. A. (2022). Disposition to Good Governance and Achievement Striving Behaviour: Role of Motivator Variables. Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 32(1), 123.
Batubara, B. M., Kusmanto, H., & Ginting, B. (2023). Conceptual Model Implementation of Poverty Reduction Policy in Medan City. International Journal of Sustainable Development & Planning, 18(4).
Bilan, Y., Mishchuk, H., Roshchyk, I., & Joshi, O. (2020). Hiring and retaining skilled employees in SMEs: problems in human resource practices and links with organizational success. Business: Theory and Practice, 21(2), 780-791.
Capano, G., & Howlett, M. (2020). The knowns and unknowns of policy instrument analysis: Policy tools and the current research agenda on policy mixes. Sage Open, 10(1), 2158244019900568.
Dewintania, R. N., Rachmawati, I., & Saputra, U. N. (2023). Analysis of Zoning System Implementation Policies in The Admission of New Students of Junior High School in Sukabumi City. International Journal of Educational Research Excellence (IJERE), 2(2), 267-274.
Faro, B., Abedin, B., & Cetindamar, D. (2022). Hybrid organizational forms in public sector’s digital transformation: A technology enactment approach. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 35(6), 1742-1763.
Fatmawati, F., Mustari, N., Haerana, H., Niswaty, R., & Abdillah, A. (2022). Waste bank policy implementation through collaborative approach: comparative study—Makassar and Bantaeng, Indonesia. Sustainability, 14(13), 7974.
Gao, X., & Yu, J. (2020). Public governance mechanism in the prevention and control of the COVID-19: information, decision-making and execution. Journal of Chinese Governance, 5(2), 178-197.
Haelg, L., Sewerin, S., & Schmidt, T. S. (2020). The role of actors in the policy design process: Introducing design coalitions to explain policy output. Policy Sciences, 53(2), 309-347.
Hartawan, R. C., & Kosasih, F. (2023). Implementation of the van meter and van horn zoning system policies model. International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences, 2(4).
Lotta, G. S., & Marques, E. C. (2020). How social networks affect policy implementation: An analysis of street‐level bureaucrats' performance regarding a health policy. Social Policy & Administration, 54(3), 345-360.
Muksin, Z., Rahim, A., Hermansyah, A., & Satispi, E. (2024). Implementation of village road infrastructure development policy using Van Meter and Van Horn models. Jurnal Inovasi Ilmu Sosial dan Politik (JISoP), 6(1), 37-46.
Polat, Z. A., & Alkan, M. (2020). The role of government in land registry and cadastre service in Turkey: Towards a government 3.0 perspective. Land Use Policy, 92, 104500.
Priyatmo, R., & Satria, O. H. (2022). Electronic Records, Record Management System, System Usability Scale, SRIKANDI. Jurnal Kearsipan, 17(1).
Putera, R. E., & Koeswara, H. (2023). Analysis of Implementation of OSS-RBA Policy in Padang City. Journal of Public Administration and Government, 5(2), 203-218.
Ratshidi, L., Grobbelaar, S., & Botha, A. (2022). Conceptualising the factors influencing community health workers’ preparedness for ICT implementation: A systematised scoping review. Sustainability, 14(14), 8930.
Rokhadiyati, A. (2020). Evaluation of Implementation Policy on Management of School Operational Fund (BOS) 2019 with Edward III Model. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 53(1), 25-42.
Roziqin, A., Mas’ udi, S. Y., & Sihidi, I. T. (2021). An analysis of Indonesian government policies against COVID-19. Public Administration and Policy, 24(1), 92-107.
Satiawan, A. A. P., Wahyuni, S., & Casmiwati, D. Implementation of Perkasal Policy Number 38 of 2021 Regarding the Acceptance of Cadets and Cadets of the AL Navy Academy in a Gender Perspective. Science and Education, 4(6), 551-560.
Steinebach, Y. (2022). Instrument choice, implementation structures, and the effectiveness of environmental policies: A cross‐national analysis. Regulation & Governance, 16(1), 225-242.
Trullen, J., Bos‐Nehles, A., & Valverde, M. (2020). From intended to actual and beyond: A cross‐disciplinary view of (human resource management) implementation. International Journal of Management Reviews, 22(2), 150-176.
Trzeciak, M., Kopec, T. P., & Kwilinski, A. (2022). Constructs of project programme management supporting open innovation at the strategic level of the organisation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(1), 58.
Villa Alvarez, D. P., Auricchio, V., & Mortati, M. (2022). Mapping design activities and methods of public sector innovation units through the policy cycle model. Policy sciences, 55(1), 89-136.
Worren, N., & Pope, S. (2024). Connected but conflicted: Separating incompatible roles in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 49(1), 6-31.
Abstract
Views:
91, 
PDF downloads: 71
