Analisis Perbandingan Pendekatan Plugged-in dan Unplugged dalam Pengembangan Kemampuan Computational Thinking pada Anak Usia Dini: Tinjauan Sistematis Literature Review

Authors

  • Lathifatul Fajriyah Institut Agama Islam Tribakti
  • Revina Rizqiyani Institut Agama Islam Negeri Metro
  • Fadilatul Fitria Universitas Islam Tribakti Lirboyo Kediri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33367/ijhass.v3i2.6123

Keywords:

Plugged and Unplugged, Computational Thinking, Early Childhood

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out more about computational thinking learning using plugged and un-plugged. The research method used in this study is a systematic literature review with the aim of detecting and then reviewing relevant research studies published from 2019-2024. It was found that 28 scientific articles had met the inclusion criteria for analysis and would then be analyzed based on their methodology and findings. The results of the study found that computational thinking learning with a plugged and un-plugged approach can be applied to early childhood. The plugged approach aims to make concepts easy to understand for students which can increase their motivation in learning, while the unplugged approach can be used if there are limitations in technological tools.

References

Acosta, Yeni, Ángel Alsina, and Nataly Pincheira. “Computational Thinking and Repetition Patterns in Early Childhood Education: Longitudinal Analysis of Representation and Justification.” Education and Information Technologies 29, no. 6 (2024): 7633–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12051-6.

Battal, Ali, Gülgün Afacan Adanır, and Yasemin Gülbahar. “Computer Science Unplugged: A Systematic Literature Review.” Journal of Educational Technology Systems 50, no. 1 (2021): 24–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395211018801.

Farantika, Dessy, Lathifatul Fajriyah, Rina Insani, Universitas Nahdaltul, Ulama Blitar, and Universitas Tribakti Kediri. “Simulate Development With STEAM Learning.” 2nd International Conference On Early Childhood Education in Multiperspective 2 (2023).

Fitriyah, Qonitah Faizatul, Lutfiana Rahmadhania Saputri, and Havida Inaya Aljawad. “Praktik Unplugged Coding Berbasis Daily Lives Dalam Meningkatkan Computational Thinking Pada Anak Usia Dini.” Jurnal Pendidikan Anak 12, no. 2 (2023): 176–85.

Ingram-Goble, A. (2013). Playable stories: Making programming and 3d role-playing game Design personally and socially relevant. Indiana University.

Kerres, Michael, and Svenja Bedenlier. Systematic Reviews in Educational Research. Systematic Reviews in Educational Research, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27602-7.

Lee, Jin-Ting. “Book Review: Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research.” HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal 12, no. 1 (2019): 164–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586719832223.

Lüken, Miriam M., and Odile Sauzet. “Patterning Strategies in Early Childhood: A Mixed Methods Study Examining 3- to 5-Year-Old Children’s Patterning Competencies.” Mathematical Thinking and Learning 23, no. 1 (2021): 28–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1719452.

Maryani, Krisiana. “Pemerolehan Sintaksis Pada Anak Usia 3, 4, Dan 5 Tahun.” Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter “JAWARA” (JPKJ) 4, no. 1 (2018): 41–47.

Masarwa, Bayan, Hagit Hel-Or, and Sharona T. Levy. “Kindergarten Children’s Learning of Computational Thinking With the ‘Sorting Like a Computer’ Learning Unit.” Journal of Research in Childhood Education 38, no. 2 (2024): 165–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2023.2221319.

Metin, Şermin, Damla Kalyenci, Mehmet Başaran, Emily Relkin, and Büşra Bilir. “Design-Based Digital Story Program: Enhancing Coding and Computational Thinking Skills in Early Childhood Education.” Early Childhood Education Journal, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-024-01728-3.

Misirli, Anastasia, and Vassilis Komis. “Computational Thinking in Early Childhood Education: The Impact of Programming a Tangible Robot on Developing Debugging Knowledge.Pdf.” Elsevier Inc., 2023.

Mulyati, Mumun. “Tren Dan Pengembangan Keterampilan Berpikir Komputasional Anak Usia Dini Pada Abad 21: Perspektif Teoretis.” Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini 7, no. 4 (2023): 4155–65. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v7i4.4005.

Olmo-Muñoz, Javier del, Ramón Cózar-Gutiérrez, and José Antonio González-Calero. “Computational Thinking through Unplugged Activities in Early Years of Primary Education.” Computers and Education 150, no. September 2019 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103832.

Rovshenov, Atajan, Mert Büyükdede, and Veli Acar. Integration of Educational Robotics to STEM Education, 2022. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-3861-9.ch011.
Kalelioğ lu, F. &. (2017). Bilgisayar Bilimi Eğ itimi için Öğ retim Yöntemleri. In Y. Gülbahar (Ed.). Ankara.

Simões Gomes, Tancicleide Carina, Taciana Pontual Falcão, and Patrícia Cabral de Azevedo Restelli Tedesco. “Exploring an Approach Based on Digital Games for Teaching Programming Concepts to Young Children.” International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 16 (2018): 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2017.12.005.

Singhal, Vidhi. “Precoding Skills-Teaching Computational Thinking to Preschoolers in Singapore Using Unplugged Activities.” Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Thinking Education, 2022, 86–87. https://doi.org/10.34641/ctestem.2022.452.

Taub, Rivka, Michal Armoni, and Mordechai Ben-Ari. “CS Unplugged and Middle-School Students’ Views, Attitudes, and Intentions Regarding CS.” ACM Transactions on Computing Education 12, no. 2 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2160547.2160551.

Downloads

Abstract Views: 391, PDF downloads: 230

Published

2024-10-01

How to Cite

Fajriyah, L., Rizqiyani, R., & Fadilatul Fitria. (2024). Analisis Perbandingan Pendekatan Plugged-in dan Unplugged dalam Pengembangan Kemampuan Computational Thinking pada Anak Usia Dini: Tinjauan Sistematis Literature Review. Indonesian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(2), 245-255. https://doi.org/10.33367/ijhass.v3i2.6123