Keadilan Substantif dalam Rekrutmen Penyandang Disabilitas: Analisis Dinamika Sistem Merit dan Kebijakan Afirmatif di Polri
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33367/ijhass.v6i4.8480Keywords:
Merit System, Inclusive Recruitment, Persons with Disabilities, PolriAbstract
The Indonesian National Police (Polri) has implemented affirmative action policies for persons with disabilities (PWDs) in response to Law No. 8 of 2016, introducing new dynamics into a recruitment system historically characterized by hierarchical structures and physical fitness standards. This study examines the interaction between the merit system and affirmative action in Polri’s recruitment of PWDs, with a particular focus on the realization of substantive justice. Employing a qualitative descriptive-analytical method, this research relies on secondary audiovisual data and literature review, and is theoretically grounded in merit system, recruitment, and affirmative action frameworks. The findings indicate that Polri applies the BETAH principles (Clean, Transparent, Accountable, and Humanist), which are consistent with merit-based recruitment when complemented by reasonable accommodations, including adjusted selection and testing mechanisms, to ensure equal opportunities for PWDs. While this policy reflects a progressive approach, its effectiveness remains contingent upon the development of adaptive technical guidelines and diversified assessment instruments to safeguard objectivity and moral legitimacy in the recruitment process. The study contributes novelty by conceptualizing affirmative action not as a departure from meritocracy, but as a corrective mechanism that addresses the limitations of procedural merit in achieving substantive fairness within inclusive recruitment practices.
References
Afrizal. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Sebuah Upaya Mendukung Penggunaan Penelitian Kualitatif dalam Berbagai Disiplin Ilmu. Cetakan Kedua. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Cresswell, J. W. (2015). Penelitian Kualitatif dan Desain Riset: Memilih diantara Lima Pendekatan (3rd ed.). (Terj). Ahmad L. Lazuardi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Daly, John. L. (2012). Human Resources Management in the Public Sector: Policies and Practices. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Haryanto, H., & Juwono, V. (2022). Conceptual Framework for Application of Affirmative Action on Recruitment and Selection in Policies Agencies. DIA Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik, 20(01): 151-163. https://doi.org/10.30996/dia.v20i01.6141.
Herman. (2012). Meritokrasi dalam Pengisian Jabatan Pegawai Negeri Sipil di Indonesia. Disertasi: FISIP Universitas Indonesia, Depok.
Major, B., Feinstein, J., & Crocker, J. (1994). Attributional Ambiguity of Affirmative Action. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 15, 113-141. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1501.
Mccourt, W. (2007). The Merit System and Integrity in The Public Service. Conference on Public Integrity and Anticorruption in the Public Service, 29–30 May 2007, Bucharest.
Muchtar, M., U., Nisa, L., Siska, D., & , M. (2020). Evaluasi Penerimaan CPNS bagi Penyandang Disabilitas di Pemerintah Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan. Jurnal Kebijakan Pembangunan, 15(2): 203-217. https://doi.org/10.47441/jkp.v15i2.136.
Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis. Language Teaching Research, 19, 129 - 132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815572747.
Official iNews. (2024, March 28). Rekrutmen Penyandang Disabilitas, Komitmen Polri Wujudkan Kesetaraan - Polri Presisi 28/03 [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJcS77TMsSk
Peraturan Kapolri Nomor 10 tahun 2016 tentang Penerimaan Calon Anggota Polri.
Purboyo, A., Riyadi, B., Irawan, A., & Inkiriwang, F. (2024). Connecting Strategic Environment and Recruitment Policy: A Case Study of the Indonesian National Army. International Journal of Religion, 5(2): 301-315. https://doi.org/10.61707/mdbct891.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.
Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2016 tentang Penyandang Disabilitas.
Shafritz, Jay M., Rosenbloom, David H., Riccucci, Norma M., Naff, Katherine C., & Hyde, Albert C. (2001). Personnel Management in Government: Politics and Process. New Yok: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
Son Hing, L. S., Bobocel, D. R., & Zanna, M. P. (2002). Meritocracy and opposition to affirmative action: Making concessions in the face of discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 493–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.493
Taylor, F. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. Harper & Brothers.
United States Congress. (1978). Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, Pub. L. No. 95-454, 92 Stat. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Weber, Max. (1922). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Woodard, C. A. (2000). Merit principles and public service employment: Foundations of fairness in the civil service. Washington, DC: Public Administration Press
Yudanto, D., & Soeling, P. (2023). Strategy of Recruitment and Selection for Indonesian National Police (POLRI) Candidates. Khazanah Sosial, 5(1), 12-27. https://doi.org/10.15575/ks.v5i1.20964
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rexy Hamza Subroto, Annisa Rahmi, Zalfa Ghaffara Rahman

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Views:
47,
PDF downloads: 43






