Discretionary Process Ruislag Waqf In The Settlement Of Waqf Land Cases In The Sidoarjo Mud Disaster Area
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33367/ijhass.v4i3.4553Keywords:
Sidoarjo Mud Disaster,, Ruislag Waqf,, DiscretionAbstract
This research aims to know the concept of waqf ruislag in positive law and Islamic law, the process of waqf ruislag in the Sidoarjo mud disaster area with all its problems, and know the concept of discretion as an alternative solution in solving its problems. From the results of the research conducted, it is known that waqf ruislag is indeed very complicated and the process is tiered. This situation is solely made by the government in order to keep waqf assets safe, not used by irresponsible nazhir individuals, but in natural disaster situations such as what happened in Sidoarjo, The complexity of the waqf ruislag process actually makes waqf land which by law has met the requirements for ruislag, difficult to do, so that until now, many waqf lands have not received the ruislag (change) process which causes the loss of benefits of waqf property as pledged by wakif, even though the purpose of waqf is that the benefits can be felt by the community. Therefore, discretion as a breakthrough process for Breaking through the regulatory deadlock needs to be done by authorized officials, although in this discretionary process care must be taken so that good intentions to carry out the task of serving the people result in lawsuits in the future.
References
Atasoy, Emrah. “From the Text to the Reader: An Application of Reader-Response Theory to Robert Browning’s ‘My Last Duchess.’†Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi, no. 7 (December 15, 2020): 196–209. https://doi.org/10.46250/kulturder.828951.
Babaee, Ruzbeh, and Iraj Montashery. “Stanley Fish with Respect to the Reader.†International Journal of English and Literature. Vol 3, no. 2 (2012): 18–24.
Beach, Richard. “Critical Discourse Theory and Reader Response: How Discourses Constitute Reader Stances and Social Contexts.†Reader 37 (1997): 1.
———. “Critical Issues: Reading and Responding to Literature at the Level of Activity.†Journal of Literacy Research 32, no. 2 (June 1, 2000): 237–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862960009548075.
Brooks, Wanda, and Susan Browne. “Towards a Culturally Situated Reader Response Theory.†Children’s Literature in Education 43, no. 1 (March 2012): 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-011-9154-z.
Caserio, Robert L. “Beyond Oedipal Psychology in ‘Sons and Lovers’: Lawrence’s ‘Foreword’ to Being and History.†The D.H. Lawrence Review 39, no. 2 (2014): 97–115.
Doherty, Gerald. “D. H. Lawrence’s ‘Sons and Lovers’ and the Culture of Sacrifice.†The D.H. Lawrence Review 34/35 (2010): 5–24.
Fish, Stanley. “Literature in the Reader: Affective Stylistics.†New Literary History 2, no. 1 (1970): 123–62. https://doi.org/10.2307/468593.
Gale, Cengage Learning. A Study Guide for DH Lawrence’s" Sons and Lovers". Gale Cengage Learning, 2016. https://books.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=G6GpDAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT32&dq=%22Sons+and+lovers+analysis+artwork&ots=DBHka-5vzk&sig=D9_pj2SRn4U4QAWyw2UZWEiOuIs.
Han, Seolji. “The Ethics of Melancholic Subjectivity in Sons and Lovers.†The D.H. Lawrence Review 41, no. 2 (2016): 7–25.
Harkin, Patricia. “The Reception of Reader-Response Theory.†College Composition and Communication, 2005, 410–25.
Harrison, Andrew. “‘I Tell You It Has Got Form — Form’: Plot, Structure, and Meaning in ‘Sons and Lovers.’†The D.H. Lawrence Review 39, no. 2 (2014): 11–24.
Harvey, Geoffrey. “Feminist Criticism.†In Sons and Lovers, edited by Geoffrey Harvey, 32–38. The Critics Debate. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18507-8_5.
Holland, Norman N. “Reader-Response Criticism.†The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 79, no. 6 (1998): 1203.
Lawrence, David Herbert. Sons and Lovers: DH Lawrence. United Kingdom: Gerald Duckworth and Company, 1913.
Mart, Cagri. “Reader-Response Theory and Literature Discussions: A Springboard for Exploring Literary Texts.†The New Educational Review 56, no. 2 (2019): 78–87.
Muhiddin, La. “Characterization in The Novel Entitled Sons and Lovers By DH Lawrence.†LINGUA : Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya 12, no. 2 (September 1, 2015): 187–200. https://doi.org/10.30957/lingua.v12i2.27.
Ogene, S. M. “Psycho-Analysis in Fiction and a Study of D. H. Lawrence’s Sons and Lovers.†AFRREV LALIGENS: An International Journal of Language, Literature and Gender Studies 2, no. 1 (2013): 95–116. https://doi.org/10.4314/laligens.v2i1.
Persson Brunsell, Oskar. A Mother's Failure : An Analysis of Mrs. Morel in D.H. Lawrence's Sons and Lovers, 2020. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-31474.
Reid, Susan. “Lawrence’s Case of Wagner: The White Peacock and The Trespasser.†In D.H. Lawrence, Music and Modernism, edited by Susan Reid, 53–83. Palgrave Studies in Music and Literature. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04999-7_3.
Rosenhan, Claudia. “Euthanasia in ‘Sons and Lovers’ and D. H. Lawrence’s Metaphysic of Life.†The D.H. Lawrence Review 32/33 (2003): 1–18.
Selden, Raman, Peter Widdowson, and Peter Brooker. A Reader’s Guide to Contemporary Literary Theory. Routledge, 2013. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315835358/reader-guide-contemporary-literary-theory-peter-brooker-peter-widdowson-raman-selden.
Spirovska, Elena. “Reader-Response Theory and Approach: Application, Values and Significance for Students in Literature Courses.†SEEU Review 14, no. 1 (July 1, 2019): 20–35. https://doi.org/10.2478/seeur-2019-0003.
Tyson, Cynthia A. “‘Get Up Offa That Thing’: African American Middle School Students Respond to Literature to Develop a Framework for Understanding Social Action.†Theory & Research in Social Education 30, no. 1 (January 1, 2002): 42–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2002.10473178.
Tyson, Lois. Using Critical Theory: How to Read and Write About Literature. Routledge, 2020.
Abstract
Views:
96, 
PDF downloads: 100
