Qur'anic Logic in The Story of Prophets Abraham And Moses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33367/al-karim.v1i1.3612Keywords:
Logika Qur’ani, Nabi Musa, Nabi Ibrahim, I’jaz al-Qur’anAbstract
This research intends to reveal the logical side of understanding God, from two great Prophets, Ibrahim and Musa through their stories in the Qur'an. This is because one of the elements of the Qur'anic mu'jizat, is a logical narrative that often appears in the dialogue of the prophets. Prophet Ibrahim and Prophet Musa, were sent to a people who were smart enough to argue regarding their own misguidance. Both faced similar problems: facing idolaters and unjust rulers. In terms of requests to Allah, both even asked for almost the same thing: Prophet Ibrahim asked his descendants to be granted prophethood. Prophet Musa, asked that his brother be appointed Prophet. Both of them, at the level of trying to understand the Power of God itself: Prophet Ibrahim asked God about bringing the dead back to life; Prophet Moses asked about the knowledge that Prophet Khidir possessed. Methodically, this article is a literature study with a narrative approach to the same theme found in the stories of Prophet Ibrahim and Prophet Moses. This study concludes that there are at least two things in which both logically refute idolaters and rulers through narratives that are neatly recorded in the Qur'an. It also logically shows human aspects of kinship and curiosity.
Contribution: This research reveals the logical approach in the Qur'anic narrative through the stories of Prophet Ibrahim and Prophet Musa in understanding divinity.
Downloads
References
Aarssen, L. W., & Crimi, L. (2016). Legacy, leisure and the ‘work hard—Play hard’ hypothesis. The Open Psychology Journal, 9. Retrieved from aarssenl@queensu.ca, The political psychology of terrorism fears. (pp. 213–226). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199925926.003.0012
Abdollahi, A. (2013). Political psychology of the death terror. In S. J. Sinclair, D. Antonius, S. J. Sinclair (Ed), & D. Antonius (Ed) (Eds.), 329–341.
Abdollahi, A., Pyszczynski, T., Maxfield, M., & Luszczynska, A. (2011). Posttraumatic stress reactions as a disruption in anxiety-buffer functioning: Dissociation and responses to mortality salience as predictors of severity of posttraumatic symptoms. Psy, 175–184.
Abed, Shukri. Aristotelian Logic and the Arabic Language in Alfarabi. SUNY Press, 1991.
Abel, E. L., & Kruger, M. L. (2009). Mortality salience of birthdays on day of death in the major leagues. Death Studies, 33(2), 523–528.
Abeyta, A. A., Juhl, J., & Routledge, C. (2014). Exploring the effects of self-esteem and mortality salience on proximal and distally measured death anxiety: A further test of the dual process model of terror management. Motivation and Emotion, 38(4), Handbook of terror management theory. (pp. 209–225). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811844-3.00008-1
Abeyta, A. A., Nelson, T. A., & Routledge, C. (2019). Precious time: The role of time and temporal thought in managing death awareness. In C. Routledge & M. Vess (Eds.), The development of the social self. (pp. 291–312). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203391099_chapter_11
Abidin, Ahmad Zainal, Thoriqul Aziz, and Dewi Charisun Chayati. “Beberapa Isu Teologi Dan Syari’ah Dalam Perspektif Islam Dan Agama Samawi Lainnya: Studi Kasus Pemikiran M. Quraish Shihab,†2020, 55–82. https://doi.org/10.15408/quhas.v9i2.16951.
Abrams, D. (2004). The development of social identity: What develops? In M. Bennett, F. Sani, M. Bennett (Ed), & F. Sani (Ed) (Eds.), et al. “Searching for God: Illness-Related Mortality Threats and Religious Search Volume in Google in 16 Nations.†Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2018.
Abu AbdullÄh Muḥammad ibn Umar ibn al-Husayn at-TaymÄ« al-Bakri at-TabaristÄnÄ«, Fakhr al-DÄ«n al-RÄzÄ«. MafÄtiḥ Al-Ghayb. Beirut: Dar ‘Ihya’ al-Turats al-A’rabi, 2000.
Abu al-QÄsim MaḥmÅ«d ibn Umar, Al-ZamakhsharÄ«. Al-KasyÄf ‘an HaqÄ`iqi GhawÄmidi al-TanzÄ«l. Beirut: DÄr al-Kutub al-ArabÄ«, 1987.
Akrami, Musa. “From Logic in Islam to Islamic Logic.†Logica Universalis 11, no. 1 (2017): 61–83.
Aram, Mohammad Reza. “The Classical Tafsir Works Of Both Shias And Sunnis On The Interpretation of The Mustaqarr And Mustawda.†European Journal of Science and Theology 11, no. 4 (2015): 13–22.
Habib, Habib, and Muslich Shabir. “Al-Ghazali’s Qur’anic Sufi Hermeneutics: Study on the Story of Abraham In Search of God.†KALAM 15, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.24042/klm.v15i2.9523.
Jabbar, Bassim Ziarra, Fadhil Abbas Lateef, and Yusra Kareem Resen. “Criticism Of The Body Of The Interpretive Narrations In Light Of The Critical Criteria Of Allama Tabatabai: Applied Models Of Interpretation Of Al-Mizan.†PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology 17, no. 7 (2020): 5992–6007.
Ketika Barat Memfitnah Islam. Gema Insani, 2005.
Khakim, Usmanul, Khasib Amrullah, and Hifni Nasif. “Metode Sains: Membaca Pemikiran Epistemologis al Attas Dan Wall.†IJoIS: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Studies 2, no. 2 (2021): 181–90.
Nur, Muhammad. “The Qur’anic Logic in al-Ghazali’s Book al-Qistas al-Mustaqim.†KALAM 14, no. 1 (2020): 37–56.
Rahmat, Romdani Yumna Rasyid Aceng. “Comparative Language Style Of Moses Story In Al-Quran.†ALSINATUNA 3, no. 2 (August 20, 2018): 200–224. https://doi.org/10.28918/alsinatuna.v3i2.1170.
Saleh, Fauzan. Kajian Filsafat Tentang Keberadaan Tuhan Dan Pluralisme Agama. Kediri: STAIN Kediri Press, 2011.
Stewart, Devin J. “Speech Genres and Interpretation of the Qur’an.†Religions 12, no. 7 (2021): 529.
Street, Tony. “Arabic and Islamic Philosophy of Language and Logic.†In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2013.
Studies in Medieval Philosophy. Studies in Medieval Philosophy, 2018. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv176b6
Wahyudi, Chafid. “Tuhan Dalam Perdebatan Eksistensialisme.†Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf Dan Pemikiran Islam 2, no. 2 (December 3, 2012): 369–88. https://doi.org/10.15642/teosofi.2012.2.2.369-388.
Abstract
Views:
278, 
PDF downloads: 106
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Muhammad Taqiyuddin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
-
The formal legal aspect of access to any information and articles contained in this journal site refers to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license.
-
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Licensed under a 