Heutagogy in Improving Metacognitive Intelligence of Students in Pesantren

Authors

  • M. Yunus Abu Bakar UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, East Java
  • Hasan Baharun Universitas Nurul Jadid Paiton Probolinggo
  • Nur Silfiataun Hasanah Universitas Nurul Jadid Paiton Probolinggo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33367/psi.v7i2.2503

Keywords:

Heutagogy, Metacognitive intelligence, Ma’had Aly

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the heutagogical approach to improving the metacognitive intelligence of students at Ma'had Aly. This study used a qualitative approach with phenomenological research. The researchers attempted to understand the phenomena of education and learning activities in Ma'had Aly. Researchers conducted participatory observations, interviews, and documentation. Data analysis was carried out through the stages of data display, data reduction, and data conclusion. The results showed that the heutagogical approach implemented at Ma'had Aly improved students' metacognitive intelligence through some activities, including a reading test with the blank matter, meaning understanding, memorizing nadzom, and achieving the learning goal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aboagye, E., & Yawson, J. A. (2020). Teachers’ perception of the new educational curriculum in Ghana. African Educational Research Journal, 8(1), 6–12.

Amir. (2019). Membangun Budaya Mutu Pada Lembaga Pendidikan Islam Menuju Madrasah Unggul. Al-Tanzim : Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 3(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.33650/al-tanzim.v3i2.676

Asiri, A. A. (2020). Teachers’ Perceptions of Educational Administers’ Support for Inclusive Education. Journal of Education and Learning, 9(6), 112. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v9n6p112

Baharun, H., Muali, C., Minarti, S., & Qurohman, M. T. (2019). Analysis of Metacognitive Capability and Student Learning Achievement Through Edmodo Social Network. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics, Conf. Seri, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1175/1/012150

Beni, S., Fletcher, T., & Ní Chróinín, D. (2022). ‘It’s not a linear thing; there are a lot of intersecting circles’’: Factors influencing teachers’ implementation of Meaningful Physical Education.’ Teaching and Teacher Education, 117(103806), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103806

Bernadette M. Racicot. (2020). Metacognitive Strategies on Reading English Texts of ESL Freshmen: A Sequential Explanatory Mixed Design. 15(1), 20–30.

Chaudhuri, S., Muhonen, H., Pakarinen, E., & Lerkkanen, M. K. (2022). Teachers’ visual focus of attention in relation to students’ basic academic skills and teachers’ individual support for students: An eye-tracking study. Learning and Individual Differences, 98, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102179

Chimpololo, A. (2019). An analysis of heutagogical practices through mobile device usage in a teacher training programme in Malawi. Journal of Learning for Development, 7(2), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v7i2.391

Erkan, A. (2019). Impact of Using Technology on Teacher-Student Communication/Interaction: Improve Students Learning. World Journal of Education, 9(4), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v9n4p30

Fauzan, M., Groot, W., & Witte, K. De. (2022). Teachers ’ preferences for online professional development : Evidence from a discrete choice experiment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 119, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103870

Febrina, E. (2019). Metakognitif Sebagai Keterampilan Berfikir Tingkat Tinggi Pada Pembelajaran Abad 21. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 6(1), 25–32.

Irfan, S., Soomro, K., & Hussain, N. (2019). Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies, Reading Practices and Academic Attainments of University Students. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 6(1), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v6i1.2749

Iskandar, S. M. (2014). Pendekatan Keterampilan Metakognitif dalam Pembelajaran Sains di Kelas. Erudio: Journal of Educational Innovation, 2(2), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.18551/erudio.2-2.3

James, H. D., & Bulusan, F. (2020). Metacognitive strategies on reading english texts of ESL freshmen: A sequential explanatory mixed design. TESOL International Journal, 15(1), 20–30.

Khoeriyah, M. (2019). Heutagogy in the Course of Pesantren Education (Case Study At Pesantren Salaf Al-Luqmaniyyah). Sunan Kalijaga International Journal on …, 3(1), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.14421/skijier.2019.2019.31.07

Lestari, B., Nindiasari, H., & Fatah, A. (2019). Penrapan Pendekatan Metakognitif untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berfikir Kritis Matematis Siswa SMA ditinjau dari Tahap Perkembangan Metakognitif. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.31000/prima.v3i2.1209

Maher, E. M., Jung, H., & Newton, J. A. (2022). Mathematics Learning, Teaching, and Equity in Policy and Programs: The Case of Secondary Mathematics Teacher Education in the United States. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 10(2), 308–327. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2110

Muali, C., Minarti, S., Taufik Qurohman, M., & Haimah. (2019). Analysis of metacognitive capability and student learning achievement through edmodo social network. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1175(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1175/1/012150

Muhid, A., Amalia, E. R., Hilaliyah, H., Budiana, N., & Wajdi, M. B. N. (2020). The effect of metacognitive strategies implementation on students’ reading comprehension achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 847–862. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13257a

Nadelson, L. S., Berg, W., Fox, B., Grandbouche, P., Harris, M., Kroschel, T. L., & Sandoval, S. (2017). Snap, Tweet and Post: College Student Social Media Perceptions and Heutagogic Practices and Uses. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(4), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n4p11

Othman, Y., Mahamud, Z., & Jaidi, N. (2014). The effects of metacognitive strategy in reading expository texts. International Education Studies, 7(13), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n13p102

Prestiana, K. E., & Sugito, S. (2021). Managing human resource development of educators in inclusion-based elementary school. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 15(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v15i1.16749

Puspitasari, I. N. N. (2018). Pendidikan Pragmatis-Progresif Islamic Internasional (IIS) Kediri Di Era Industri 4.0. REALITA; Jurnal Penelitian Dan Kebudayaan Islam, 16(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.30762/realita.v16i2.1034

Sakarina, S., Pratiwi, R., & Surahman, S. (2022). Strategic Management of Islamic Education: Revealing The Challenges of Professionalism. Al-Tanzim: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 06(03), 778–788.

Segarra, J., & Julià , C. (2022). Mathematics Teaching Efficacy Belief and Attitude of Pre-service Teachers and Academic Achievement. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.30935/SCIMATH/11381

Singh, S., Kumar, S., & Singh, R. K. (2020). A Study of Attitude of Teachers towards Inclusive Education. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 9(1), 189–197. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v9i1.3511

Siyaya, M. C. (2022). Information Literacy and Metacognitive Abilities of Teachers: Case of a South African Rural School. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 10(1), 173. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.10n.1p.173

Sulistia, R. (2019). Heutagogy As A Training Approach For Teachers In The Era Of Industrial Revolution 4.0. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 4(1), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v4i2.1222

Sutama, S., Anif, S., Prayitno, H. J., Narimo, S., Fuadi, D., Sari, D. P., & Adnan, M. (2021). Metacognition of Junior High School Students in Mathematics Problem Solving Based on Cognitive Style. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(1), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i1.12604

Tantowi, A., Subhan, A., & Romadon, S. (2022). Mutual Relationship Management Between Teachers and Parents : Strategies for Improving Student Learning Outcomes. Al-Tanzim: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 06(03), 802–813.

Tümen Akyıldız, S. (2019). Do 21st Century Teachers Know about Heutagogy or Do They Still Adhere to Traditional Pedagogy and Andragogy? International Journal of Progressive Education, 15(6), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2019.215.10

Van Geel, M., Keuning, T., & Safar, I. (2022). How teachers develop skills for implementing differentiated instruction: Helpful and hindering factors. Teaching and Teacher Education: Leadership and Professional Development, 1(July), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tatelp.2022.100007

Vemde, L. Van, Donker, M. H., & Mainhard, T. (2022). Teachers , loosen up ! How teachers can trigger interpersonally cooperative behavior in students at risk of academic failure. Learning and Instruction, 82, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101687

Vreeze-Westgeest, M. G. J. de, & Vogelaar, B. (2022). Cognitive Training in the Domain of Mathematics for Potentially Gifted Children in Primary School. Education Sciences, 12(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020127

Zhou, M. (2014). Teachers’ and Parents’ Perceptions of Parental Involvement on Inner City Children’s Academic Success. Georgia Educational Researcher, 11(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.20429/ger.2014.110103

Downloads

Abstract Views: 645, PDF downloads: 182

Published

2022-12-01

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2022): Journal An-Nafs: Kajian Penelitian Psikologi

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
M. Yunus Abu Bakar et al. 2022. Heutagogy in Improving Metacognitive Intelligence of Students in Pesantren. Journal An-Nafs: Kajian Penelitian Psikologi. 7, 2 (Dec. 2022), 184–196. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33367/psi.v7i2.2503.