Communication Ethics of Generation Z and Millennial Generation on Tiktok Social Media
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33367/ijhass.v5i3.5966Keywords:
Communication ethics, Generation Z, Millennial Generation, TikTok, Social MediaAbstract
Problems often faced in the context of social media in Indonesia include the spread of fake news (hoaxes), hate speech, cyberbullying, and privacy violations. TikTok's popularity among Generation Z and Millennials makes it an ideal platform to study how these generations understand and apply communication ethics in the digital era. The research method used is a descriptive qualitative research method. Overall, this study shows that both Millennials and Generation Z have different understandings and applications of communication ethics, but both recognize the importance of ethical principles in communication on social media. The integration of communication ethics theory with practice in the field provides valuable insights into how ethics can be applied and maintained on platforms such as TikTok. This study reveals the differences in views between Millennials and Generation Z regarding communication ethics on TikTok, as well as how these ethics are operationalized and their impact on social interactions.
References
Abidin, C. (2021). Instagram and the Digital Public Sphere. Routledge.
Boyd, D. (2014). It's Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. Yale University Press.
BPS. (2021). Statistik Kependudukan dan Penggunaan Media Sosial di Indonesia. Badan Pusat Statistik.
ELSAM. (2021). Pelanggaran Privasi Digital di Indonesia. Laporan Penelitian.
Flew, T. (2014). New Media: An Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. Yale University Press.
GSMA. (2022). The Mobile Economy: Indonesia 2022. Laporan Industri.
Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2005). Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences. In Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage
Publications.
Hess, A. (2022). "Cancel Culture and Its Impact on Social Media Influencers." Journal of Media Studies, 18(2), 45-62.
Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. Vintage Books.
Jones, C., & Mitchell, K. J. (2016). Online Safety for Children: Cyberbullying and Online Predators. Cambridge University Press.
Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilization of Mass Communication by the Individual. In The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research. Sage.
Kominfo (2022). Pedoman Etika Komunikasi di Media Sosial. Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia.
Kominfo. (2021). Laporan Pelanggaran Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia.
Lim, E. (2013). Friendster dan Era Awal Media Sosial di Asia. Penerbit Asia.
Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2008). Theories of Human Communication. Waveland Press.
Mastel. (2019). Penyebaran Hoaks di Media Sosial Indonesia. Laporan Penelitian.
Nurudin, M. (2012). Sejarah Media Sosial di Indonesia. Penerbit Media.
Rubin, R. B. (2009). Communication Research Measures: A Sourcebook. Routledge.
SAFEnet. (2021). Laporan Ujaran Kebencian di Media Sosial. Laporan Tahunan.
Supratman, S. (2018). Transformasi Media Sosial di Indonesia: Dari Friendster ke TikTok. Penerbit Inovasi.
Supratman, L. P. (2018). Penggunaan media sosial oleh digital native. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 15(1), 47-60.
Survei Microsoft. (2020). Tingkat Perilaku Kasar Online di Asia Pasifik. Survei.
UNICEF & KPPPA. (2020). Perundungan Siber di Indonesia: Dampak dan Tindakan. Laporan Penelitian.
Utomo, A. (2015). Perkembangan Facebook di Indonesia. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi, 5(2), 45-56.
Wang, Y., et al. (2019). Online Communication and Its Impact on Social Relationships. Routledge.
We Are Social & Hootsuite. (2023). Digital 2023: Indonesia. Laporan Tahunan.
Abstract
Views:
590, 
PDF downloads: 356
