Exploring Student Engagement in University through Lecturer Competence: A Tripod 7Cs Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33367/psi.v10i2.8196Keywords:
Student Engagement, Lecturer Competence, Tripod 7C's, Regression Analysis, Higher EducationAbstract
This study aims to empirically examine and model the influence of lecturer competence on student engagement in higher education, operationalized through the Tripod 7Cs framework, at Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia. The 7Cs framework consists of seven instructional competencies—Care, Confer, Captivate, Clarify, Consolidate, Challenge, and Classroom Management—with student engagement conceptualized across three dimensions: Vigor, Absorption, and Dedication. Addressing the limited application of the Tripod 7Cs framework in higher education and non-Western contexts, this study investigates both the simultaneous and differential effects of the seven competencies on distinct engagement components. Participants consisted of 129 undergraduate students (N = 129), including 43 men (33.33%) and 86 women (66.67%), selected using convenience sampling. Data were collected via an online questionnaire. Lecturer competence was measured using the Tripod 7Cs Instrument, while student engagement was assessed using the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for Students (UWES-S). Rasch measurement modeling was employed to ensure construct validity and reliability prior to hypothesis testing. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to examine the predictive effects of the 7Cs dimensions on each engagement component. In addition, a thematic analysis of open-ended responses was performed to triangulate the quantitative findings and provide contextual insight into students’ perceptions of effective teaching practices.The results revealed distinct and non-uniform relationships between lecturer competencies and engagement dimensions. The Captivate dimension emerged as a significant predictor of Vigor (β = 0.260, p = .044) and the strongest predictor of Absorption (β = 0.429, p < .001), indicating the central role of engaging instructional delivery in fostering energy and deep learning immersion. The Care dimension significantly predicted Vigor (β = 0.231, p = .040) and Dedication (β = 0.253, p = .020), highlighting the importance of relational and emotional support in sustaining students’ commitment to learning. Conversely, Clarify did not demonstrate a direct statistical effect on engagement, although qualitative findings underscored its role as a foundational instructional prerequisite. This study contributes novel empirical evidence by extending the Tripod 7Cs framework to higher education, demonstrating its applicability in an Indonesian, non-Western context, and revealing the differential predictive power of specific lecturer competencies across engagement dimensions. The findings offer actionable implications for faculty development, emphasizing that effective teaching in higher education requires not only instructional clarity, but also engaging delivery and caring lecturer–student relationships to foster meaningful and sustained student engagement.
Downloads
References
Abidin, Z., & Muhammad, N. (2024). Effective classroom management as a quick solution to improve student participation and motivation in the learning process. Zabags International Journal of Education, 2(2), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.61233/zijed.v2i2.22
Aldrup, K., Carstensen, B., & Klusmann, U. (2022). Is empathy the key to effective teaching? A systematic review of its association with teacher–student interactions and student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 34(3), 1177–1216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09649-y
Al-Thani, N. J., & Ahmad, Z. (2025). Teaching and learning with research cognitive theory: Unlocking curiosity and creativity for problem-solving skills. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-87544-1
Altun, M. (2017). The role of passion in effective teaching and learning. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 3(3), 155–158. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v3i3p155
Anwar, N., Juanda, Anderson, J., & Williams, T. (2024). Applying data science to analyze and improve student learning outcomes in educational environments. International Transactions on Education Technology (ITEE), 3(1), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.33050/itee.v3i1.679
Archambault, I., Janosz, M., Fallu, J., & Pagani, L. S. (2009). Student engagement and its relationship with early high school dropout. Journal of Adolescence, 32(3), 651–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.06.007
Ayala, J. C., & Manzano, G. (2018). Academic performance of first-year university students: The influence of resilience and engagement. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(7), 1321–1335. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1502258
Bakker, A. B., Sanz Vergel, A. I., & Kuntze, J. (2015). Student engagement and performance: A weekly diary study on the role of openness. Motivation and Emotion, 39(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9422-5
Barut Tugtekin, E., & Dursun, O. O. (2022). Effect of animated and interactive video variations on learners’ motivation in distance education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3247–3276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10735-5
Bayoumy, H. M. M., & Alsayed, S. (2021). Investigating relationship of perceived learning engagement, motivation, and academic performance among nursing students: A multisite study. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 12, 351–369. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S272745
Benlahcene, A., Awang-Hashim, R., & Kaur, A. (2020). Personal best goals: Do they mediate the relationship between teacher autonomy support and student engagement? Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 17(1), 25–49. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2020.17.1.2
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Bowden, J. L.-H., Tickle, L., & Naumann, K. (2021). The four pillars of tertiary student engagement and success: A holistic measurement approach. Studies in Higher Education, 46(6), 1207–1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1672647
Buch, B., Christiansen, R. B., Hansen, D., Petersen, A. K., & Skovbjerg Sørensen, R. (2018). Using the 7Cs framework for designing MOOCs in blended contexts—New perspectives and ideas. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(3), 421–429. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060309
Burke, C. M., Montross, L. P., & Dianova, V. G. (2024). Beyond the classroom: An analysis of internal and external factors related to students’ love of learning and educational outcomes. Data, 9(6), Article 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/data9060081
Catacutan, A. B., Kilag, O. K. T., Jr., D. F. M., Tiongzon, B. D., Malbas, M. H., & Abendan, C. F. K. (2023). Competence-based curriculum development in a globalized education landscape. Excellencia International Multi-Disciplinary Journal of Education, 1(4), 270–282.
Chagas, F. A. L. D., & Muñoz-García, A. (2023). Examining the influence of meaning in life and religion/spirituality on student engagement and learning satisfaction: A comprehensive analysis. Religions, 14(12), Article 1508. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14121508
Cheng, X. (2023). Looking through goal theories in language learning: A review on goal setting and achievement goal theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1035223. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1035223
Chisunum, J. I., & Nwadiokwu, C. N. (2024). Enhancing student engagement through practical production and utilization of instructional materials in an educational technology class: A multifaceted approach. NIU Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.58709/niujed.v10i2.2002
Chiu, T. K. F. (2023). Student engagement in K-12 online learning amid COVID-19: A qualitative approach from a self-determination theory perspective. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(6), 3326–3339. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1926289
Christensen, W., & Bicknell, K. (2022). Cognitive control, intentions, and problem solving in skill learning. Synthese, 200(6), Article 460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03920-7
Costantini, A., Bakker, A. B., & Scharp, Y. S. (2025). Playful study design: A novel approach to enhancing student well-being and academic performance. Educational Psychology Review, 37(2), Article 47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10022-6
Dimitriadou, S., Lavidas, K., Karalis, T., & Ravanis, K. (2020). Study engagement in university students: A confirmatory factor analysis of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale with Greek students. Journal of Well-Being Assessment, 4(3), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41543-021-00035-7
Divya, P. (2018). Reading behaviour in digital environment: A study among students of universities in Kerala (Doctoral dissertation). University of Calicut.
Długosz, P., & Liszka, D. (2021). The relationship between mental health, educational burnout and strategies for coping with stress among students: A cross-sectional study of Poland. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(20), Article 10827. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010827
Dzaiy, A. H. S., & Abdullah, S. A. (2024). The use of active learning strategies to foster effective teaching in higher education institutions. Zanco Journal of Humanity Sciences, 28(4), 328–351. https://doi.org/10.21271/zjhs.28.4.18
Egeberg, H., & McConney, A. (2018). What do students believe about effective classroom management? A mixed-methods investigation in Western Australian high schools. The Australian Educational Researcher, 45(2), 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-017-0250-y
Ekornes, S. (2017). Teacher stress related to student mental health promotion: The match between perceived demands and competence to help students with mental health problems. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(3), 333–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1147068
Ferrer, J., Ringer, A., Saville, K., Parris, M. A., & Kashi, K. (2022). Students’ motivation and engagement in higher education: The importance of attitude to online learning. Higher Education, 83(2), 317–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00657-5
García-Pérez, L., García-Garnica, M., & Olmedo-Moreno, E. M. (2021). Skills for a working future: How to bring about professional success from the educational setting. Education Sciences, 11(1), Article 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010027
Graham, S. (2022). Self-efficacy and language learning—What it is and what it isn’t. The Language Learning Journal, 50(2), 186–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2022.2045679
Hambleton, R. K. (2001). The next generation of the ITC test translation and adaptation guidelines. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17(3), 164–172. https://doi.org/10.1027//1015-5759.17.3.164
Hisey, F., Zhu, T., & He, Y. (2024). Use of interactive storytelling trailers to engage students in an online learning environment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 25(1), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874221107574
Holen, S., Waaktaar, T., & Sagatun, Å. (2018). A chance lost in the prevention of school dropout? Teacher–student relationships mediate the effect of mental health problems on noncompletion of upper-secondary school. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(5), 737–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2017.1306801
International Test Commission. (2018). ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (2nd ed.). International Journal of Testing, 18(2), 101–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2017.1398166
Julianto, P., & Halim, A. (2025). The effect of lecturer characteristics, lecturer reward system, and lecturer commitment on lecturer welfare in private universities in Jambi Province. Greenation International Journal of Tourism and Management (GIJTM), 3(3), 296–305.
Kotera, Y., Lieu, J., Kirkman, A., Barnes, K., Liu, G. H. T., Jackson, J., Wilkes, J., & Riswani, R. (2022). Mental wellbeing of Indonesian students: Mean comparison with UK students and relationships with self-compassion and academic engagement. Healthcare, 10(8), Article 1439. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10081439
Kravchenko, M., & Cass, A. K. (2018). Attention retention: Ensuring your educational content is engaging your students. In V. L. Uskov, R. J. Howlett, & L. C. Jain (Eds.), Smart education and e-learning 2017 (Vol. 75, pp. 358–370). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59451-4_36
Linacre, J. M. (2006). Rasch measurement. Transactions of the Rasch Measurement, 20(1), 1045–1054.
Liu, Y., Ma, S., & Chen, Y. (2024). The impacts of learning motivation, emotional engagement and psychological capital on academic performance in a blended learning university course. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1357936. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1357936
Ma, Y.-C. (2023). Using participatory teaching in hands-on courses: Exploring the influence of teaching cases on learning motivation. Education Sciences, 13(6), Article 547. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060547
Martinot, D., Sicard, A., Gul, B., Yakimova, S., Taillandier-Schmitt, A., & Maintenant, C. (2022). Peers and teachers as the best source of social support for school engagement for both advantaged and priority education area students. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 958286. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.958286
McArthur, J. (2023). Rethinking authentic assessment: Work, well-being, and society. Higher Education, 85(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00822-y
McKenney, S., Kali, Y., Markauskaite, L., & Voogt, J. (2015). Teacher design knowledge for technology-enhanced learning: An ecological framework for investigating assets and needs. Instructional Science, 43(2), 181–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9337-2
Niemi, K. (2021). ‘The best guess for the future?’ Teachers’ adaptation to open and flexible learning environments in Finland. Education Inquiry, 12(3), 282–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1816371
Nurmala, I., Muthmainnah, Hariastuti, I., Devi, Y. P., & Ruwandasari, N. (2021). The role of knowledge, attitude, gender, and school grades in preventing drug use: Findings on students’ intentions to participate in peer education program. Journal of Public Health Research, 10(3), Article 1972. https://doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2021.1972
Olayide Odutayo, A., Samuel Jacob, U., Aina Gbolade Opesemowo, O., & Omoponle Adewuyi, H. (2024). Lecturer–student interaction patterns and academic engagement: The university dynamics. Journal of Education and Teaching (JET), 5(3), 230–246. https://doi.org/10.51454/jet.v5i3.427
Peng, L., Deng, Y., & Jin, S. (2022). The evaluation of active learning classrooms: Impact of spatial factors on students’ learning experience and learning engagement. Sustainability, 14(8), Article 4839. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084839
Ponsford, R., Falconer, J., Melendez-Torres, G., & Bonell, C. (2022). Whole-school interventions promoting student commitment to school to prevent substance use and violence: Synthesis of theories of change. Health Education Journal, 81(5), 614–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/00178969221100892
Puiu, S., Udriștioiu, M. T., Petrișor, I., Yılmaz, S. E., Pfefferová, M. S., Raykova, Z., Yildizhan, H., & Marekova, E. (2024). Students’ well-being and academic engagement: A multivariate analysis of the influencing factors. Healthcare, 12(15), Article 1492. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12151492
Quinlan, K. M. (2019). What triggers students’ interest during higher education lectures? Personal and situational variables associated with situational interest. Studies in Higher Education, 44(10), 1781–1792. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1665325
Qureshi, M. A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2023). Factors affecting students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4), 2371–2391. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1884886
Raghunathan, S., Darshan Singh, A., & Sharma, B. (2022). Study of resilience in learning environments during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Education, 6, Article 677625. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.677625
Ramadani, S., Sinaga, P., & Liliawati, W. (2025). Critical thinking in science learning: Systematic literature review. Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, 4(1), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.46843/jpm.v4i1.378
Rohm, A. J., Stefl, M., & Ward, N. (2021). Future proof and real-world ready: The role of live project-based learning in students’ skill development. Journal of Marketing Education, 43(2), 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/02734753211001409
Rowley, J. F. S., Phillips, S. F., & Ferguson, R. F. (2019). The stability of student ratings of teacher instructional practice: Examining the one-year stability of the 7Cs composite. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 30(4), 549–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2019.1620293
Rustamova, B. (2025). Faculty–student relationships and psychological safety in the university setting. New Renaissance International Scientific Journal, 2(5), 1827–1831. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14990112
Saeed Alghamdi, M., & Abdulrhamn Khadawardi, H. (2024). Investigating the impact of teacher enthusiasm on engagement among Saudi first-year EFL students. International Journal of English Language Education, 12(2), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v12i2.22241
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248
Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2021). Self-efficacy and human motivation. In Advances in motivation science (Vol. 8, pp. 153–179). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2020.10.001
Serki, N., & Bolkan, S. (2024). The effect of clarity on learning: Impacting motivation through cognitive load. Communication Education, 73(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2023.2250883
Shao, Y., Kang, S., Lu, Q., Zhang, C., & Li, R. (2024). How peer relationships affect academic achievement among junior high school students: The chain mediating roles of learning motivation and learning engagement. BMC Psychology, 12(1), Article 278. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01780-z
Shernof, D. J., Ruzek, E. A., Sannella, A. J., Schorr, R. Y., Sanchez-Wall, L., & Bressler, D. M. (2017). Student engagement as a general factor of classroom experience: Associations with student practices and educational outcomes in a university gateway course. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 994. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00994
Siregar, R. A., Purnawarman, P., Damayanti, I. L., & Raja, F. D. (2024). The lonely journey of EFL pre-service teachers in remote areas: Readiness and challenges in integrating ICT in teaching. Teaching English with Technology, 24(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.56297/FSYB3031/WWCS6171
Skinner, E. A., & Raine, K. E. (2022). Unlocking the positive synergy between engagement and motivation. In A. L. Reschly & S. L. Christenson (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 25–56). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07853-8_2
Tang, H., Datu, J. A. D., Liu, Z., Shen, J., & Xing, Q. (2023). The engaged lives of encouraged students: Academic encouragement, grit and academic engagement in Chinese first year undergraduate students. Current Psychology, 42(23), 19526–19536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03057-3
Tong, D. H., Uyen, B. P., & Ngan, L. K. (2022). The effectiveness of blended learning on students’ academic achievement, self-study skills and learning attitudes: A quasi-experiment study. Heliyon, 8(12), Article e12657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12657
Tripod Education Partners. (2016). Guide to Tripod’s 7Cs. Tripod Education Partners.
Virtanen, T. E., Lerkkanen, M.-K., Poikkeus, A.-M., & Kuorelahti, M. (2015). The relationship between classroom quality and students’ engagement in secondary school. Educational Psychology, 35(8), 963–983. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.822961
Vomund, J., & Miller, A. D. (2025). The promise and process of adaptive teacher empathy to support equity in diverse classrooms. Educational Psychologist, 60(2), 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2024.2418070
Wang, C. K. J., Liu, W. C., Kee, Y. H., & Chian, L. K. (2019). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness in the classroom: Understanding students’ motivational processes using self-determination theory. Heliyon, 5(7), Article e01983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01983
Weiner, J., Francois, C., Stone-Johnson, C., & Childs, J. (2021). Keep safe, keep learning: Principals’ role in creating psychological safety and organizational learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Education, 5, Article 618483. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.618483
Wong, Z. Y., & Liem, G. A. D. (2022). Student engagement: Current state of the construct, conceptual refinement, and future research directions. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 107–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09628-3
Yang, D., Chen, P., Wang, H., Wang, K., & Huang, R. (2022). Teachers’ autonomy support and student engagement: A systematic literature review of longitudinal studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 925955. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.925955
Zhang, H., & Tian, M. (2025). Unpacking the multi-dimensional nature of teacher competencies: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 69(5), 1004–1025. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2024.2369867
Abstract
Views:
69, 
PDF downloads: 15
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Devie Yundianto, Muhammad Khatami, Isna Mutmainah, Anggun Pastika Sandi, Siti Nabilah, Febi Mutiara Sani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
