The Principle of Reciprocity in Contemporary Court Decisions: Analysis of Qirā'ah Mubādalah in Divorce Decisions of the Surabaya Religious High Court

Ali Ma'shum; Yustafad; Fatmah; Nailal Muna; Mohammad Rafli; Muhammad Khowarizmi

doi:10.33367/d0mvem37

Authors

Ali Ma'shum Universitas Islam Tribakti Lirboyo Kediri
Yustafad Universitas Islam Tribakti Lirboyo Kediri
Fatmah Universitas Islam Tribakti Lirboyo Kediri
Nailal Muna Universitas Islam Tribakti Lirboyo Kediri
Mohammad Rafli Universitas Islam Tribakti Lirboyo Kediri
Muhammad Khowarizmi University of Exeter

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33367/d0mvem37

Keywords:

qira’ah mubadalah, Divorce, Maintenance Rights, Judges' Considerations

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to analyze contemporary judges' considerations in divorce case rulings at the Surabaya Religious High Court and to examine the principle of reciprocity in the Qirā'ah mubādalah theory. Alimony rulings are not based on the status of the father (male) or the mother (female), but rather on who is considered more capable of fulfilling it.

Method - The method used was library research by reviewing the divorce decision of the Surabaya Religious High Court in case No. 217/Pdt.G/2021/PTA.Sby. The analysis was carried out using the concept of Qirā’ah mubādalah theory.

Findings – The results of the study show that the judge's considerations were not only focused on normative aspects, but also on the socio-economic context of the parties and the correction of procedural errors at the first level. The revocation of māḍiyah income and the adjustment of ḥaḍānah income reflect situational justice in accordance with Q.S. At-ṭalāq. The principle of Qirā'ah mubādalah in the Surabaya Religious High Court (PTA) decision can be seen from the placement of men and women as equal subjects. The adjustment of livelihoods reflects mutual and relational justice, and shows that mubādalah values can be integrated into formal law in a fair and legitimate manner.

Research implications and limitations – The limitation of this paper is that it does not present many court decisions on divorce cases as comparative data for this decision.

Originality – The study is original in applying Qirā’ah mubādalah to court decision analysis.

References

Adinugraha, Hendri Hermawan, Asep Suraya Maulana, and Mila Sartika. “Kewenangan Dan Kedudukan Perempuan Dalam Perspektif Gender: Suatu Analisis Tinjauan Historis.” Marwah: Jurnal Perempuan, Agama Dan Jender 17, no. 1 (2018): 42. https://doi.org/10.24014/marwah.v17i1.4515.

Amanda, Maria. “Syarat Formil Gugatan Rekonvensi.” Leks&co Lawyers, 2012.

Arifin, Zainal. Penelitian Pendidikan; Metode Dan Paradigma Baru. Ramaja Rosdakarya, 2012.

‘Auda, Jasser. Maqāṣid Al-Sharī‘ah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach. International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2008.

Azizah, Nur. “Aliran Feminis Dan Teori Kesetaraan Gender Dalam Hukum.” SPECTRUM: Journal of Gender and Children Studies 1, no. 1 (2021): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.30984/spectrum.v1i1.163.

Baharudin, Indah Satria, and M. Ariq Gumilang AS. “Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Putusan Verstek Pada Perkara Perceraian Nomor 1916/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Tnk.” Amsir Law Journal 4, no. 2 (2023): 246–53. https://doi.org/10.36746/alj.v4i2.190.

Cappelletti, Mauro. “Judicial Review in Comparative Perspective.” California Law Review 58, no. 5 (1970): 1017. https://doi.org/10.2307/3479676.

DIY, Humas Pemda. “Isu Gender Bukan Hanya Soal Perempuan.” Pemerintah Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, 2021.

Elhelw, Sandra. “Where Intersectionality and Multiculturalism Meet: Australian Muslim Women’s Experiences of Domestic and Family Violence.” Violence Against Women 31, no. 9 (2025): 2168–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012241254850.

Handayani, T., and D. Ilyas. “Isu Gender : Potret Relasi Masa Lampau, At a Glance.” Jurnal Ilmu Agama: Mengkaji Doktrin, Pemikiran, Dan Fenomena Agama 15, no. 2 (2014): 35–48.

Handayani, Yulmitra. “TIPOLOGI PELAKSANAAN KEWAJIBAN NAFKAH LAHIR SUAMI YANG BERSTATUS NARAPIDANA PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ISLAM (Studi Analisis Interpretasi Teori Qira’ah Mubadalah).” JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 19, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v19i1.1882.

Harahap, M. Yahya. Hukum Acara Perdata Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, Dan Putusan Pengadilan. Sinar Grafika, 2007.

Hasbullah, Nurfajri. “Implementasi Putusan Hakim Terhadap Tuntutan Perkara Pemenuhan Hak Nafkah Dan Hadhanah Pasca Perceraian Pada Pengadilan Agama Parepare.” In Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 2. no. 1. 2022.

Ibrahim, Johni. Teori & Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Cet. III. Bayumedia Publishing, 2007.

Jamil, Abdul, and Muliadi Nur. “Perlindungan Hukum Dan Keadilan Para Pihak Melalui Ex Officio Hakim Dalam Putusan Verstek Perkara Perceraian.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 29, no. 2 (2022): 439–60. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol29.iss2.art10.

Khairuddin, Badri, and Nurul Auliyana. “Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Putusan Nafkah Pasca Perceraian (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Syar’iyah Aceh Nomor 01/Pdt.G/2019/Ms.Aceh).” El-Usrah 3, no. 2 (2020): 164–89. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v3i2.7700.

Kodir, Faqihuddin Abdul. Memilih Monogami. Pusaka Pesantren, 2005.

Kodir, Faqihuddin Abdul. Qira’ah Mubadalah: Tafsir Progresif Untuk Keadilan Gender Dalam Islam. IRCiSoD, 2019.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Liberty, 2009.

Mir-Hosseini, Z., K. Vogt, L. Larsen, and C. Moe. Gender and Equality in Muslim Family Law: Justice and Ethics in the Islamic Legal Tradition. Gender and Equality in Muslim Family Law: Justice and Ethics in the Islamic Legal Tradition. 2013. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85186025248&partnerID=40&md5=0a3bf1dc0864ab4d79bff8be0ae42ecd.

Mir-Hosseini, Ziba. “Justice and Equality and Muslim Family Laws: New Ideas, New Prospects.” In Sharia and Justice, edited by Abbas Poya. De Gruyter, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110574593-005.

Miswanto, Arif Fikri, and Edi Susilo. “Relasi Suami-Istri: Telaah Kompilasi Hukum Islam Perspektif Teori Mubadalah.” Bulletin of Community Engagement 4, no. 2 (2024).

Morotai, Pengadilan Agama. “Penanganan Perkara.”

Muna, Nailul, and Lailatul Zuhriyah. Analysis Of Manustcript Study Of An The An- Nikah Book By Syaikh Kholil Bin Abdul Lathif. n.d., 2.

Nadhifah, Ainin. Interpretasi Resiprokal Dalam Pernikahan Adat Bajapuik Minangkabau Perspektif Qira ’ Ah Mubadalah. 5, no. 4 (2024): 2303–16.

Nisa, Septiani Chairul. “Implementasi Kesetaraan Gender Wanita Kelas Atas Dalam Sejarah Perjuangan Wanita Indonesia.” Jurnal Wanita Dan Keluarga 4, no. 1 (2023): 42–54. https://doi.org/10.22146/jwk.6396.

Nurlaelawati, Euis. Modernization, Tradition and Identity: The Kompilasi Hukum Islam and Legal Practice in the Indonesian Religious Courts. Amsterdam University Press, 2010. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt46msj2.

Nyoman, I. “Syarat Materiil Dan Formal Gugatan Rekonvensi Dalam Perkara Perdata.” Lex Privatum III, no. 2 (2015): 71–72.

Prahara, Erwin. “Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Tanggung Jawab Tergugat Dalam Pemberian Nafkah Pasca Putusan Cerai.” Jurnal Usm Law Review 1, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v1i1.2225.

“Putusan Mahkamah Agung No.330 K/Pdt/1986.”

Putusan Pengadilan Agama (PA) Kediri Nomor 0519/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Kdr,.

Putusan PTA Surabaya Nomor 217/Pdt.G/2021/PTA.Sby (2021).

Ramadhani, Laily Fitria, Nailul Maromi, and Ahmad Khayat Tudin. “Pendekatan Sibernetika Dalam Hukum : Analisis Presepsi Talcott Parsons Terhadap Dinamika Sistem Nasional Hukum Indonesia.” Media Hukum Indonesia 2, no. 4 (2024): 38–39.

Ramadhani, Muhammad Rake. “Konsep Kepemimpinan Perempuan Dalam Keluarga Perspektif Kompilasi Hukum Islam (Studi Menurut Teori Mubadalah Faqihuddin Abdul Kodir).” Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung, 2023.

Rusydi, Bustanul Arifien. “Problem Kehadiran Dan Upaya Hukum Tergugat Dalam Putusan Verstek Perkara Perceraian Pada Pengadilan Agama Bandung.” Muslim Heritage 5, no. 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.21154/muslimheritage.v5i2.2362.

Rusydiana, Naili Rosa Urbah, and Hadiana Trendi Azami. “Interpretation Q.S. an-Nisa’: 34 Perspectives of Amina Wadud Muhsin and The Implication of Her Thinking In Indonesia.” Jurnal Ushuluddin 29, no. 1 (2021): 87. https://doi.org/10.24014/jush.v29i1.11931.

“Salinan Putusan Hakim Nomor 0026/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Kdr.” Preprint, 2020.

Saputri, Nadya. “Faktor Ekonomi Sebagai Penyebab Cerai Gugat Perspektif Teori Keadilan (Studi Kasus Di Pengadilan Agama Ponorogo Tahun 2022).” Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ponorogo, 2024.

Sitorus, Syahrul. “Upaya Hukum Dalam Perkara Perdata (Verzet , Banding, Kasasi, Peninjauan Kembali Dan Derden Verzet).” Jurnal Hikmah 15, no. 64 (2018): 63–71.

Sodiq, Yushau. “Islamic Natural Law Theories: By Anver M. Emon (New York: Oxford University Press, 2010. Hbk. 222 Pages).” American Journal of Islam and Society 28, no. 3 (2011): 143–45. https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v28i3.1243.

Undang Undang No.4 Tahun 2004. “Undang Undang No.4 Tahun 2004.” Demographic Research, 2018.

Wadud, Amina. Qur’an and Woman: Rereading The Sacred Text From a Woman’s Perspective. New York, 1999.